This week, the goal was to learn about incorporating elements of UDL into lessons. You may be wondering what UDL stands for. The Universal Design for Learning framework, also referred to as UDL, is a framework that gives teachers ways to help make lessons accessible for all students using different means of delivery. The assumption is that since no person is alike, just as there are a multitude of learners in a classroom, they each come with their own way of processing and communicating information. Cultural backgrounds, language levels, behavior, and physical or mental needs affect how students learn. Since the UDL is a framework rather than a checklist, it gives teachers strategies to plan to provide the most successful learning experiences for their diverse classes.
I observed and participated in a lesson taught by my mentor teacher to introduce our current writing unit. The topic is nonfiction writing, but it also ties in with science, and the final project will be for the students to write and present an All About animal book that they have authored and illustrated themselves. Overall, the children are excited about getting to write their own books. We have a few students who have siblings that had made books in Mrs. V's class before.
"Mrs. V, where are we going to get the information to use for the books?" one of the children asked. To answer, she had the class get up and walk back to a table in the back of the room to show them the books she had gathered for them to use. She went through showing all of the covers, reading the titles. Next, to practice how the children will use the books to research their animals, Mrs. V had each child grab a book and return to sit on the rug in the front of the room. The day's learning target was, "I can identify non-fiction text features and explain how they help me understand the text."
Seated, with their books open, Mrs. V. introduced each text feature and had the students look for it in their book. I walked around and helped to make sure the children were able to find what she had mentioned. I also tried to make sure our MLLs observed and participated. We looked at the table of contents, bold words, headings, the glossary, and labels. We did not make any charts to record those words, but it is something that could have come in handy to meet the learning target. I am not sure if the students met the learning target. Informally, I saw students who were able to point out labels on multiple pages and find bold words they had seen in the glossary. Formatively, I think the children just need more exposure to those terms to retain them and are able to explain how they help them understand the text.
On Day 2 of the non-fiction writing lesson, we began the process of gathering information about an animal. Can you guess which one Mrs. V. chose?
![]() |
| The UDL suggests providing ways for students to organize information. |
![]() |

Another activity the students took part in this week was to complete a directed drawing, which will become the cover of their All About Narwhals book. To change up the normal routine of sitting at tables to do the work, the children were treated to sitting at little Surf portable lap desks to do their drawings. They look a bit like this:

.jpg)






.jpg)

I really appreciated how clearly you connected your observations to the UDL framework. You did a great job showing that UDL is not just about adding “extra” supports, but about intentionally planning multiple ways for students to access content. I especially loved the narwhal lesson example, the anchor chart with labeled quadrants and picture cues is such a strong scaffold for kindergarteners. The visuals (like the plate for diet and house for habitat) are such a powerful way to reduce cognitive load, especially for MLLs.
ReplyDeleteI also thought it was meaningful that students were given choice in selecting their animals and research sources. That really aligns with providing multiple means of engagement, which is such an important part of UDL. Giving them ownership likely increases motivation and investment in the final product.
Your reflection about not being sure whether students fully met the learning target was honest and thoughtful. I wonder, if you were to reteach or extend this lesson, what kind of formative assessment might you add to better measure whether students can explain how nonfiction text features help them understand the text (not just identify them)? Would something like a quick partner talk, drawing response, or mini exit ticket work at the kindergarten level?
Overall, this sounds like such a joyful and developmentally appropriate way to introduce nonfiction writing!
That was a good question about what could be done to assess if the students understood the text features. Talking to my mentor teacher about formative assessment, she said that sometimes it is not possible to check in with every student, but you can get an overall feel for how the students have grasped a lesson or not. I guess, for a sampling of students. I could have shown them one of the text features and asked them what it was and how it helped to understand the text. An example I thought of could be to show the student a label and ask , "What is this?" Once they respond correctly (or incorrectly) I could ask, "How does it help us understand the text?" The response should be similar to,"It tells us the name of what it's pointing to (or connected to)."
ReplyDelete